Absence Heightens Presence

Walking down Seattle night streets, I came upon these trees adorned with Christmas lights.  My aesthetic mind created an instant division: I loved the moving lights up in the branches and had next to no emotional reaction to the static lights on the tree trunks.  What made the moving lights so much more appealing?

Could it be that each absence of light makes the presence of it more vibrant, more intense.

Could this same revelation be applied to my reading aesthetics?

Is this why I find books filled with figurative language page after page less appealing than books that only feature effective and well developed figurative language when absolutely necessary?

Like the static lights on the tree trunks, the too frequent presence of metaphors, similes, and analogies reduces my appreciation of an author’s artistry.  I need the appropriate absence of figurative speeches to fully feel the impact of their presence.

Leave a comment

Filed under Views

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s